it is by his irresistible power to reach the adventurous side in the character, not only of his own, but of all nations, that marryat is largely human. he is the enslaver of youth, not by the literary artifices of presentation, but by the natural glamour of his own temperament. to his young heroes the beginning of life is a splendid and warlike lark, ending at last in inheritance and marriage. his novels are not the outcome of his art, but of his character, like the deeds that make up his record of naval service. to the artist his work is interesting as a completely successful expression of an unartistic nature. it is absolutely amazing to us, as the disclosure of the spirit animating the stirring time when the nineteenth century was young. there is an air of fable about it. its loss would be irreparable, like the curtailment of national story or the loss of an historical document. it is the beginning and the embodiment of an inspiring tradition.

to this writer of the sea the sea was not an element. it was a stage, where was displayed an exhibition of valour, and of such achievement as the world had never seen before. the greatness of that achievement cannot be pronounced imaginary, since its reality has affected the destinies of nations; nevertheless, in its grandeur it has all the remoteness of an ideal. history preserves the skeleton of facts and, here and there, a figure or a name; but it is in marryat’s novels that we find the mass of the nameless, that we see them in the flesh, that we obtain a glimpse of the everyday life and an insight into the spirit animating the crowd of obscure men who knew how to build for their country such a shining monument of memories.

marryat is really a writer of the service. what sets him apart is his fidelity. his pen serves his country as well as did his professional skill and his renowned courage. his figures move about between water and sky, and the water and the sky are there only to frame the deeds of the service. his novels, like amphibious creatures, live on the sea and frequent the shore, where they flounder deplorably. the loves and the hates of his boys are as primitive as their virtues and their vices. his women, from the beautiful agnes to the witch-like mother of lieutenant vanslyperken, are, with the exception of the sailors’ wives, like the shadows of what has never been. his silvas, his ribieras, his shriftens, his delmars remind us of people we have heard of somewhere, many times, without ever believing in their existence. his morality is honourable and conventional. there is cruelty in his fun and he can invent puns in the midst of carnage. his naiveties are perpetrated in a lurid light. there is an endless variety of types, all surface, with hard edges, with memorable eccentricities of outline, with a childish and heroic effect in the drawing. they do not belong to life; they belong exclusively to the service. and yet they live; there is a truth in them, the truth of their time; a headlong, reckless audacity, an intimacy with violence, an unthinking fearlessness, and an exuberance of vitality which only years of war and victories can give. his adventures are enthralling; the rapidity of his action fascinates; his method is crude, his sentimentality, obviously incidental, is often factitious. his greatness is undeniable.

it is undeniable. to a multitude of readers the navy of to-day is marryat’s navy still. he has created a priceless legend. if he be not immortal, yet he will last long enough for the highest ambition, because he has dealt manfully with an inspiring phase in the history of that service on which the life of his country depends. the tradition of the great past he has fixed in his pages will be cherished for ever as the guarantee of the future. he loved his country first, the service next, the sea perhaps not at all. but the sea loved him without reserve. it gave him his professional distinction and his author’s fame — a fame such as not often falls to the lot of a true artist.

at the same time, on the other side of the atlantic, another man wrote of the sea with true artistic instinct. he is not invincibly young and heroic; he is mature and human, though for him also the stress of adventure and endeavour must end fatally in inheritance and marriage. for james fenimore cooper nature was not the frame-work, it was an essential part of existence. he could hear its voice, he could understand its silence, and he could interpret both for us in his prose with all that felicity and sureness of effect that belong to a poetical conception alone. his fame, as wide but less brilliant than that of his contemporary, rests mostly on a novel which is not of the sea. but he loved the sea and looked at it with consummate understanding. in his sea tales the sea inter-penetrates with life; it is in a subtle way a factor in the problem of existence, and, for all its greatness, it is always in touch with the men, who, bound on errands of war or gain, traverse its immense solitudes. his descriptions have the magistral ampleness of a gesture indicating the sweep of a vast horizon. they embrace the colours of sunset, the peace of starlight, the aspects of calm and storm, the great loneliness of the waters, the stillness of watchful coasts, and the alert readiness which marks men who live face to face with the promise and the menace of the sea.

he knows the men and he knows the sea. his method may be often faulty, but his art is genuine. the truth is within him. the road to legitimate realism is through poetical feeling, and he possesses that — only it is expressed in the leisurely manner of his time. he has the knowledge of simple hearts. long tom coffin is a monumental seaman with the individuality of life and the significance of a type. it is hard to believe that manual and borroughcliffe, mr. marble of marble-head, captain tuck of the packet-ship montauk, or daggett, the tenacious commander of the sea lion of martha’s vineyard, must pass away some day and be utterly forgotten. his sympathy is large, and his humour is as genuine — and as perfectly unaffected — as is his art. in certain passages he reaches, very simply, the heights of inspired vision.

he wrote before the great american language was born, and he wrote as well as any novelist of his time. if he pitches upon episodes redounding to the glory of the young republic, surely england has glory enough to forgive him, for the sake of his excellence, the patriotic bias at her expense. the interest of his tales is convincing and unflagging; and there runs through his work a steady vein of friendliness for the old country which the succeeding generations of his compatriots have replaced by a less definite sentiment.

perhaps no two authors of fiction influenced so many lives and gave to so many the initial impulse towards a glorious or a useful career. through the distances of space and time those two men of another race have shaped also the life of the writer of this appreciation. life is life, and art is art — and truth is hard to find in either. yet in testimony to the achievement of both these authors it may be said that, in the case of the writer at least, the youthful glamour, the headlong vitality of the one and the profound sympathy, the artistic insight of the other — to which he had surrendered — have withstood the brutal shock of facts and the wear of laborious years. he has never regretted his surrender.